FXRoad Review: Legit Broker or Just Another Scam?

Today we present an FXRoad overview, a detailed account of a platform whose offers seem so attractive that they resemble yet another trap. This Forex/CFD broker claims that its top priority is reliability and security. The project representatives assure that trading on global markets is easy when traders have access to an intuitive platform, unique trading conditions, professional educational materials, and top-level support. However, behind these loud statements lies nothing but a set of standard promises, unsupported by real facts or concrete actions. Want to know if this company can be trusted, or whether clients are likely to face bitter disappointment and irrecoverable losses? You’ll find answers in the materials we have prepared.

Does FXRoad Show Any Risk Factors?

Overall, after a closer look at the platform, we concluded that it does not deserve a high rating. All of its actions are aimed solely at enriching the owners, while the interests of traders are completely ignored. Such an approach is typical of a scam project. However, the company asserts that the broker operates under a license.

According to official information posted by FXRoad on its website, it is managed by 4Square SY Limited, registered in the Seychelles. This company holds license SD052, issued by the local financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of Seychelles. These details are indeed verifiable.

We also see that the company operates under two trading names: Capitalix and FXRoad. Its securities dealer license allows it to provide brokerage/dealer services. In the documents available on capitalix.com (the second broker managed by this company), there is even a certificate issued by the Seychelles regulator. However, as we can see, its validity ended in May 2024. Since the company is still listed in the Regulated Entities section, we conclude that it has renewed the license on time.

The question of how long the broker has been operating is also quite important. Since the company does not disclose this on its official website, we used WHOIS data to check the domain registration date.

Unfortunately, we did not find any useful information in the service data. The domain fxroad.com is quite old, existing since 2011. It is clear, however, that the broker began operations significantly later. Web Archive snapshots, show that as of March 2024, the site was still under development, and the first full activity was recorded only in May 2024. Nevertheless, we see that by the time of writing our FXRoad overview, the broker has been operating online for over 1.5 years. For a regulated platform, this is not a long period, but among offshore companies, such longevity is relatively rare.

We expected that over the time the platform has existed, a significant number of publications about it would appear online. Indeed, the company’s activity is discussed quite actively. On Trustpilot alone, there are 388 fxroad.com reviews, although the portal has long since stopped accepting new comments about the broker.

At the same time, about a third of the reviews are negative. The company’s clients have many complaints, most of which are related to withdrawal issues. Among experts on specialized portals, there are also many who describe the service as a product of fraudulent activity. For example, in the WikiFX overview, no one openly calls the broker a scam, but its rating is quite low (4.64 out of 10), and users are warned about the high risks of trading on this platform.

Let’s Break Down the Jurisdiction

The brokerage license issued by the FSA of Seychelles is formally recognized internationally, but it cannot be considered top-tier. By the unofficial classification of regulators, it is Tier 2. What does this mean in practice? A company with such a license is indeed registered, its activities are regulated, and it operates within local law. However, the level of investor protection and reliability of oversight is noticeably lower than that of Tier 1 regulators such as the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (Cyprus).

In other words, holding an FSA Seychelles license should not be considered a guarantee of safety for clients.

• Low capital requirements. A broker’s financial cushion directly depends on the minimum amount of authorized capital required by the regulator. In the Seychelles, this threshold is comparatively low. According to the 2024 amendments, the minimum for a Securities Dealer license is set at just USD 100,000. For comparison: with the FCA, this figure is around USD 730,000, and with ASIC, over AUD 1,000,000. The difference is enormous. While a broker in the UK or Australia must maintain a substantial reserve to cover potential financial problems, a company with a Seychelles license is limited to an amount that appears almost symbolic in the market.
• Limited client protection. The FSA does not require participation in compensation funds and does not have a full-fledged Investor Compensation Scheme. This means that if the broker goes bankrupt, clients will not get their money back. Additionally, the regulator’s rules do not require client funds to be kept in segregated accounts. Key trading conditions, such as leverage limits, are also not regulated. In practice, this creates favorable conditions for brokers, but not for traders.
• Offshore jurisdiction. The Seychelles has long been known as a major international offshore center. A company can be registered here in just a few days, and the registration cost is comparable to a couple of hundred dollars. At the same time, the jurisdiction has become a preferred location for brokers who would not pass the scrutiny of strict Tier 1 regulators.
• Low capital requirements. A broker’s financial cushion directly depends on the minimum amount of authorized capital required by the regulator. In the Seychelles, this threshold is comparatively low. According to the 2024 amendments, the minimum for a Securities Dealer license is set at just USD 100,000. For comparison: with the FCA, this figure is around USD 730,000, and with ASIC, over AUD 1,000,000. The difference is enormous. While a broker in the UK or Australia must maintain a substantial reserve to cover potential financial problems, a company with a Seychelles license is limited to an amount that appears almost symbolic in the market.
• Limited client protection. The FSA does not require participation in compensation funds and does not have a full-fledged Investor Compensation Scheme. This means that if the broker goes bankrupt, clients will not get their money back. Additionally, the regulator’s rules do not require client funds to be kept in segregated accounts. Key trading conditions, such as leverage limits, are also not regulated. In practice, this creates favorable conditions for brokers, but not for traders.
• Offshore jurisdiction. The Seychelles has long been known as a major international offshore center. A company can be registered here in just a few days, and the registration cost is comparable to a couple of hundred dollars. At the same time, the jurisdiction has become a preferred location for brokers who would not pass the scrutiny of strict Tier 1 regulators.

What Does the Fxroad.com Website Reveal?

Some might say that the broker’s official website deserves a high rating. It indeed looks attractive and is well-optimized. However, there are minor issues, for example, under the buttons to open a real or demo account, some comments were swapped, which looks amusing. Still, these small flaws are unlikely to deter those who want to trade on this platform.

Unfortunately, more serious shortcomings are also present, and they are not related to staff errors.

• The number of countries whose residents can become clients is limited. For example, the platform does not accept registrations from the USA, Canada, Japan, or most European countries. In short, the company does not operate in jurisdictions with strict regulatory rules. This typically also applies to countries under international sanctions. Effectively, only a small list of Asian and South American countries remains.
• Registering a new client is also quite complicated. Users are required to fill out a lengthy multi-page form, providing not only standard personal and contact details but also an extended set of information: from tax identification numbers to income size and sources, as well as trading experience on financial markets.
• The number of countries whose residents can become clients is limited. For example, the platform does not accept registrations from the USA, Canada, Japan, or most European countries. In short, the company does not operate in jurisdictions with strict regulatory rules. This typically also applies to countries under international sanctions. Effectively, only a small list of Asian and South American countries remains.
• Registering a new client is also quite complicated. Users are required to fill out a lengthy multi-page form, providing not only standard personal and contact details but also an extended set of information: from tax identification numbers to income size and sources, as well as trading experience on financial markets.

The latter is quite strange, as the purpose of this questionnaire is unclear. Such a volume of information is not required to grant a trader professional status, and the regulator FXRoad works with does not impose such strict requirements. Moreover, the broker offers the same trading conditions to all clients (with a few exceptions). So why spend so much time answering questions that are ultimately irrelevant?

Another obvious drawback is the combined trading terminal and personal account. This approach clearly contradicts the broker’s statements about prioritizing security. What is the reasoning behind choosing this software? We do not have an answer yet.

Is the Broker Offering Fair or Risky Terms for Traders?

Trading conditions at FXRoad are also not entirely transparent, although their disclosure is somewhat better than that offered by other brokers. The firm provides four account types: Silver, Gold, Platinum, and Islamic.

Some important parameters are provided in the standard account descriptions. For example, spreads for different asset groups are listed. They are the same for all accounts and are as follows:

• Forex pairs — 1:200.
• Indices and commodities — 1:50.
• Stocks and ETFs — 1:10.
• Cryptocurrencies — 1:5.
• Forex pairs — 1:200.
• Indices and commodities — 1:50.
• Stocks and ETFs — 1:10.
• Cryptocurrencies — 1:5.

Judging by the published data, ‌spreads are far from competitive. For the Silver account, they start at 2.6 pips. Compared to similar parameters offered by most regulated brokers, this is more than three times higher. Even for the Platinum account, after a double 20% discount, the difference is still more than twofold.

The platform does not provide information about swaps. The only available mentions are 20% discounts for the Gold account and another 20% for Platinum. It is not indicated from which value the calculation is based. FXRoad also provides a contract specification table in XLSX format. It includes standard lot sizes, trade volume limits, and margin requirements.

Special attention should be paid to the latter. Margin values are given for retail and professional traders, allowing leverage of 1:30 for the former and 1:200 for the latter. However, judging by the terminal data, all clients receive the maximum.

As a result, there are significant risks, unacceptable for the vast majority of traders, especially beginners. FXRoad seems only too happy about this, as it can convert user deposits into its own profit without actually violating legislation or regulatory requirements.

Technical Support Analysis of FXRoad

Broker contacts raise some questions on a separate contact page, the broker provides:

• Support phone numbers in Brazil and India.
• Support email address.
• A feedback form.
• The address of the head office in the Seychelles.
• Support phone numbers in Brazil and India.
• Support email address.
• A feedback form.
• The address of the head office in the Seychelles.

There is also the option to use an online chat on the site. It looks quite solid. Unfortunately, it only looks that way. In reality:

• The provided address is also used by several dozen other companies. It is most likely virtual and offered by an intermediary handling the company’s legal registration. This suggests that the broker does not have a real office.
• The listed phone numbers are also virtual, used for VoIP calls.
• The chat bot has neither a built-in Q&A database nor AI capabilities; it can only greet users. Assistance requires a human operator, whose response time leaves much to be desired.
• The provided address is also used by several dozen other companies. It is most likely virtual and offered by an intermediary handling the company’s legal registration. This suggests that the broker does not have a real office.
• The listed phone numbers are also virtual, used for VoIP calls.
• The chat bot has neither a built-in Q&A database nor AI capabilities; it can only greet users. Assistance requires a human operator, whose response time leaves much to be desired.

Strengths and Weaknesses

• The managing company is officially registered and holds an FSA of Seychelles license.
• The official website is well-designed and optimized for fast loading.
• The managing company is officially registered and holds an FSA of Seychelles license.
• The official website is well-designed and optimized for fast loading.

• The license issued by the offshore FSA of Seychelles does not provide the same level of client protection as licenses from top regulators such as the UK’s FCA or Australia’s ASIC.
• The company accepts traders from a very limited list of countries.
• Trading conditions are not fully disclosed; the ones shown do not make trading attractive or safe.
• The website’s informational content is poor; there are no analytical or educational materials published.
• Positive reviews online are likely paid for by the project owners, while independent broker review portals often report negatively.
• The license issued by the offshore FSA of Seychelles does not provide the same level of client protection as licenses from top regulators such as the UK’s FCA or Australia’s ASIC.
• The company accepts traders from a very limited list of countries.
• Trading conditions are not fully disclosed; the ones shown do not make trading attractive or safe.
• The website’s informational content is poor; there are no analytical or educational materials published.
• Positive reviews online are likely paid for by the project owners, while independent broker review portals often report negatively.